Investigating the balance between goal-directed and habitual control in experimental and real-life settings

22Citations
Citations of this article
126Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Do people differ in their propensity to form habits? The current study related individual differences in habitual performance on the slips-of-action task to habit formation in real life. To this end, we developed a novel key-cover procedure that controls for the amount of repetition and motivation within a naturalistic setting. Participants received a key cover for the key to their home, which after several weeks was switched with a key cover that was previously attached to a dummy key. Participants recorded effort, time, attention, and mistakes in the key-selection process. Results were in line with established properties of habits, as attention decreased in the learning phase, yet effort, time, and mistakes increased after the key-cover switch. Performance on the slips-of-action task correlated negatively with changes in attention in the real-life key-cover task. This negative correlation may reflect that flexible behavioral adjustment requires more attention in people with a relatively weak goal-directed system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Linnebank, F. E., Kindt, M., & de Wit, S. (2018). Investigating the balance between goal-directed and habitual control in experimental and real-life settings. Learning and Behavior, 46(3), 306–319. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-018-0313-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free