Documentation of adverse events in non-commercial trials of intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF drugs to treat wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD)

  • Reeves B
  • Underwood W
  • Cappel-Porter H
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: IVAN and TANDEM are factorial randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of different treatment regimens for wet AMD, involving off-label use of bevacizumab. Safety data are being collected but, given follow-up visits every 4-8 weeks for up to 3 years and verbatim reporting, are difficult to collate. We have developed a database solution for the TANDEM trial to minimise duplicate adverse events or events without resolution dates, based on lessons learnt in the IVAN trial. Methods: Duplicate reporting of events can arise over multiple visits for several reasons, for example: * different verbatim reporting (or typographic errors) of the same event; * evolution of an event through stages of symptom, investigation, diagnosis, treatment; * ongoing events may not be reviewed at every visit and resolution dates may be missed; if the data record for such an event is incomplete over time, it is impossible to know whether a subsequent report describes the original event or a recurrence. Results: The database solution has the following features: * coded categories to match most common adverse events and mapped to MedDRA preferred terms, with an option to classify as 'serious', with reason; * 'other' category; * optional free-text qualification field for any event. 'Other' events will be reviewed regularly and additional categories added for common events not covered by the existing codes. After the first trial visit, a customised adverse event data form is printed from the trial database in advance of interviewing the participant. The top half of the form requires information about ongoing events to be updated, allowing evolution of an event to be described. The bottom half of the form allows new events to be documented using the coded categories and qualification field. Failure to update an ongoing event generates an automatic data validation query. Conclusions: This solution provides complete transparency of adverse event reporting and real-time coding. It requires ongoing events to be updated and minimises the problems created by free-text reporting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reeves, B. C., Underwood, W., Cappel-Porter, H., Baos, S., Rogers, C. A., Arnott, M., … Foss, A. E. (2011). Documentation of adverse events in non-commercial trials of intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF drugs to treat wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Trials, 12(S1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-s1-a13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free