Intersections and Implications: When Anthropology, Art Practice, and Art History Converge

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many insightful reflections from history and philosophy of art could be stitched together to engender an anxious train of thinking not only about art as a process and cultural product but also about its relevance in reading society and politics. Among numerous articulations on the commonsense of art, we often hear that there cannot be a formulaic vantage point to judge art, that art is essentially about a mode of experiential expression or an expression of blissful imagination and therefore is embedded in a field of subjectivism. Within this popular commonsense, a sociologist might deem these relationships and conditions too messy to decipher in a way that would make sociological sense. Such a pronounced absence of art in sociology and anthropology and anxieties about art’s reliability in reading society and its politics are the foundation of this book.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Perera, S., & Pathak, D. N. (2019). Intersections and Implications: When Anthropology, Art Practice, and Art History Converge. In Intersections of contemporary art, anthropology and art history in South Asia (pp. 1–46). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05852-4_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free