An efficient algorithm for finding short approximate non-tandem repeats

24Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We study the problem of approximate non-tandem repeat† extraction. Given a long subject string 5 of length N over a finite alphabet ∑ and a threshold D, we would like to find all short substrings of S of length P that repeat with at most D differences, i.e., insertions, deletions, and mismatches. We give a careful theoretical characterization of the set of seeds (i.e., some maximal exact repeats) required by the algorithm, and prove a sublinear bound on their expected numbers. Using this result, we present a sub-quadratic algorithm for finding all short (i.e., of length O(logAO)) approximate repeats. The running time of our algorithm is O(DN3P°w(ε)-1 log N), where ε = D/P and pow(ε) is an increasing, concave function that is 0 when ε = 0 and about 0.9 for DNA and protein sequences. © Oxford University Press 2001.

References Powered by Scopus

Alignment of whole genomes

653Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Algorithms for approximate string matching

457Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

REPuter: Fast computation of maximal repeats in complete genomes

353Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Understanding and identifying amino acid repeats

66Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Beyond tandem repeats: Complex pattern structures and distant regions of similarity

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

High-performance exact algorithms for motif search

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adebiyi, E. F., Jiang, T., & Kaufmann, M. (2001). An efficient algorithm for finding short approximate non-tandem repeats. Bioinformatics, 17(SUPPL. 1). https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.suppl_1.S5

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

44%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

28%

Researcher 7

28%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 15

65%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5

22%

Engineering 2

9%

Neuroscience 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free