DMINDA 2.0: Integrated and systematic views of regulatory DNA motif identification and analyses

45Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Motivation: Motif identification and analyses are important and have been long-standing computational problems in bioinformatics. Substantial efforts have been made in this field during the past several decades. However, the lack of intuitive and integrative web servers impedes the progress of making effective use of emerging algorithms and tools. Results: Here we present an integrated web server, DMINDA 2.0, which contains: (i) five motif prediction and analyses algorithms, including a phylogenetic footprinting framework; (ii) 2125 species with complete genomes to support the above five functions, covering animals, plants and bacteria and (iii) bacterial regulon prediction and visualization.

References Powered by Scopus

MEME Suite: Tools for motif discovery and searching

7627Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessing computational tools for the discovery of transcription factor binding sites

1011Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

STAMP: A web tool for exploring DNA-binding motif similarities

386Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

MAHTPred: A sequence-based meta-predictor for improving the prediction of anti-hypertensive peptides using effective feature representation

206Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exploring sequence-based features for the improved prediction of DNA N4-methylcytosine sites in multiple species

152Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

iProEP: A Computational Predictor for Predicting Promoter

136Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, J., Chen, X., Mcdermaid, A., & Ma, Q. (2017). DMINDA 2.0: Integrated and systematic views of regulatory DNA motif identification and analyses. Bioinformatics, 33(16), 2586–2588. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx223

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

65%

Researcher 6

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10

38%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 9

35%

Computer Science 6

23%

Chemistry 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free