Numeric planning with disjunctive global constraints via SMT

28Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper describes a novel encoding for sequential numeric planning into the problem of determining the satisfiability of a logical theory T. We introduce a novel technique, orthogonal to existing work aiming at producing more succinct encodings that enables the theory solver to roll up an unbounded yet finite number of instances of an action into a single plan step, greatly reducing the horizon at which T models valid plans. The technique is then extended to deal with problems featuring disjunctive global constraints, in which the state space becomes a non-convex n dimensional polytope. In order to empirically evaluate the encoding, we build a planner, SpringRoll, around a state-of-the-art off-the-shelf SMT solver. Experiments on a diverse set of domains are finally reported, and results show the generality and efficiency of the approach.

References Powered by Scopus

Z3: An efficient SMT Solver

5730Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

PDDL2.1: An extension to PDDL for expressing temporal planning domains

1318Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The metric-FF planning system: Translating "ignoring delete lists" to numeric state variables

411Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Multidrone aerial surveys of penguin colonies in Antarctica

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nonlinear hybrid planning with deep net learned transition models and mixed-integer linear programming

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A review of generalized planning

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scala, E., Ramirez, M., Haslum, P., & Thiebaux, S. (2016). Numeric planning with disjunctive global constraints via SMT. In Proceedings International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS (Vol. 2016-January, pp. 276–284). AAAI press. https://doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v26i1.13766

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

50%

Researcher 4

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 7

88%

Engineering 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free