Biomaterials and Contraception: Promises and Pitfalls

10Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The present state of reproductive and sexual health around the world reveals disparities in contraceptive use and effectiveness. Unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection transmission rates remain high even with current prevention methods. The 20th century saw a contraceptive revolution with biomedical innovation driving the success of new contraceptive technologies with central design concepts and materials. Current modalities can be broadly categorized according to their mode of function: reversible methods such as physical/chemical barriers or hormonal delivery devices via systemic (transdermal and subcutaneous) or localized (intrauterine and intravaginal) administration, and nonreversible sterilization procedures such as tubal ligation and vasectomy. Contraceptive biomaterials are at present dominated by well-characterized elastomers such as polydimethylsiloxane and ethylene vinyl acetate due to their favorable material properties and versatility. Contraceptives alter the normal function of cellular components in the reproductive systems to impair fertility. The purpose of this review is to highlight the bioengineering design of existing methods, explore novel adaptations, and address notable shortcomings in current contraceptive technologies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Claure, I., Anderson, D., Klapperich, C. M., Kuohung, W., & Wong, J. Y. (2020). Biomaterials and Contraception: Promises and Pitfalls. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 48(7), 2113–2131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02402-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free