Oxygen isotope composition of waters recorded in carbonates in strong clumped and oxygen isotopic disequilibrium

14Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Paleoenvironmental reconstructions, which are mainly retrieved from oxygen isotope (18O) and clumped isotope (147) compositions of carbonate minerals, are compromised when carbonate precipitation occurs in isotopic disequilibrium. To date, knowledge of these common isotopic disequilibria, known as vital effects in biogenic carbonates, remains limited, and the potential information recorded by 18O and 147 offsets from isotopic equilibrium values is largely overlooked. Additionally, in carbonates formed in isotopic equilibrium, the use of the carbonate 18O signature as a paleothermometer relies on our knowledge of the paleowaters' 18O value, which is often assumed. Here, we report the largest 147 offsets observed to date (as much as 0:270 %), measured on microbial carbonates that are strongly linked to carbonate 18O offsets (25 %) from equilibrium. These offsets are likely both related to the microorganism metabolic activity and yield identical erroneous temperature reconstructions. Unexpectedly, we show that the 18O value of the water in which carbonates precipitated, as well as the water-carbonate 18O fractionation dependence on temperature at equilibrium, can be retrieved from these paired 18O and 147 disequilibrium values measured in carbonates. The possibility to retrieve the 18O value of paleowaters, sediments' interstitial waters or organisms' body water at the carbonate precipitation loci, even from carbonates formed in isotopic disequilibrium, opens long-awaited research avenues for both paleoenvironmental reconstructions and biomineralization studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thaler, C., Katz, A., Bonifacie, M., Menez, B., & Ader, M. (2020). Oxygen isotope composition of waters recorded in carbonates in strong clumped and oxygen isotopic disequilibrium. Biogeosciences, 17(7), 1731–1744. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1731-2020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free