Should Malaria Treatment Be Guided by a Point of Care Rapid Test? A Threshold Approach to Malaria Management in Rural Burkina Faso

5Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: In Burkina Faso, rapid diagnostic tests for malaria have been made recently available. Previously, malaria was managed clinically. This study aims at assessing which is the best management option of a febrile patient in a hyperendemic setting. Three alternatives are: treating presumptively, testing, or refraining from both test and treatment. The test threshold is the tradeoff between refraining and testing, the test-treatment threshold is the tradeoff between testing and treating. Only if the disease probability lies between the two should the test be used. Methods and Findings: Data for this analysis was obtained from previous studies on malaria rapid tests, involving 5220 patients. The thresholds were calculated, based on disease risk, treatment risk and cost, test accuracy and cost. The thresholds were then matched against the disease probability. For a febrile child under 5 in the dry season, the pre-test probability of clinical malaria (3.2%), was just above the test/treatment threshold. In the rainy season, that probability was 63%, largely above the test/treatment threshold. For febrile children >5 years and adults in the dry season, the probability was 1.7%, below the test threshold, while in the rainy season it was higher (25.1%), and situated between the two thresholds (3% and 60.9%), only if costs were not considered. If they were, neither testing nor treating with artemisinin combination treatments (ACT) would be recommended. Conclusions: A febrile child under 5 should be treated presumptively. In the dry season, the probability of clinical malaria in adults is so low, that neither testing nor treating with any regimen should be recommended. In the rainy season, if costs are considered, a febrile adult should not be tested, nor treated with ACT, but a possible alternative would be a presumptive treatment with amodiaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. If costs were not considered, testing would be recommended. © 2013 Bisoffi et al.

References Powered by Scopus

The Threshold Approach to Clinical Decision Making

1075Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The burden of treatment failure in type 2 diabetes

399Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Therapeutic Decision Making: A Cost-Benefit Analysis

374Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Web-based medical decision support systems for three-way medical decision making with game-theoretic rough sets

224Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Performance of HRP2-based rapid test in children attending the health centre compared to asymptomatic children in the community

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Paracheck® rapid diagnostic test for detecting malaria infection in under five children: A population-based survey in Burkina Faso

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bisoffi, Z., Tinto, H., Sirima, B. S., Gobbi, F., Angheben, A., Buonfrate, D., & van den Ende, J. (2013). Should Malaria Treatment Be Guided by a Point of Care Rapid Test? A Threshold Approach to Malaria Management in Rural Burkina Faso. PLoS ONE, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058019

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

70%

Researcher 10

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

7%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 22

55%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10

25%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

10%

Engineering 4

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free