The Power of Group Discussion: Enhancing Reflexivity in Professionals’ Practice When Dealing with Family Diversity

2Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper describes an action research study that illustrates the potential of group discussion to enhance reflexivity on professionals’ theoretical and technical models that foster a change in their practice when facing contemporary family diversity. Focus groups were carried out with thirty-five experienced professionals (females, N = 22; males, N = 12; mean age = 45 years) working in the Italian Health Care System (IHCS). Group discussions centered on clinical cases involving same-sex families, an emerging phenomenon in Italy and still subject to social stigma. Our results showed that group discussion allowed professionals to develop a communicative process through which they changed their initial prejudiced positions. This process was named the group re-orienting process and four progressive phases were recognized: (a) defense (b) familiarization with novelty (c) self-reflection and (d) generation. Each phase is described in detail using extracts from focus group data. Implications for training and intervention are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Everri, M., Fruggeri, L., & Venturelli, E. (2015). The Power of Group Discussion: Enhancing Reflexivity in Professionals’ Practice When Dealing with Family Diversity. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28(4), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-014-9332-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free