Does hybrid working promote collaboration and creativity? An empirical study

1Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The last few years have forced organizations to look for novel methods of collaborative work in the constrained environment of the pandemic. Much research is underway to evaluate these new modes of working, as productivity and creativity continue to be critical to firms even in this new environment. This research focuses on how trust and cohesiveness within a team interact with information technology features in a hybrid environment to impact their group processes, promoting creativity. We use an Activity Theory framework to model the relationship between digital platform features, collaborative processes, and creative outcomes. The findings tentatively establish the basic hypothesis of the research that in a hybrid environment, the relational and trust capital of a team and an appropriate digital platform can promote healthy collaborative processes leading to creative outcomes. The study can help guide the design of technology platforms that are conducive to productive collaborative activities and creative learning.

References Powered by Scopus

The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing

9391Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks

4216Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice

4110Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

How marketing and sales use digital tools for innovation ideation

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chaudhury, A., & Deng, P. S. (2022). Does hybrid working promote collaboration and creativity? An empirical study. Issues in Information Systems, 23(2), 200–214. https://doi.org/10.48009/2_iis_2022_117

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

20%

Researcher 2

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 6

67%

Computer Science 1

11%

Social Sciences 1

11%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free