On the cosimulation of multibody systems and hydraulic dynamics

29Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The simulation of mechanical devices using multibody system dynamics (MBS) algorithms frequently requires the consideration of their interaction with components of a different physical nature, such as electronics, hydraulics, or thermodynamics. An increasingly popular way to perform this task is through co-simulation, that is, assigning a tailored formulation and solver to each subsystem in the application under study and then coupling their integration processes via the discrete-time exchange of coupling variables during runtime. Co-simulation makes it possible to deal with complex engineering applications in a modular and effective way. On the other hand, subsystem coupling can be carried out in a wide variety of ways, which brings about the need to select appropriate coupling schemes and simulation options to ensure that the numerical integration remains stable and accurate. In this work, the co-simulation of hydraulically actuated mechanical systems via noniterative, Jacobi-scheme co-simulation is addressed. The effect of selecting different co-simulation configuration options and parameters on the accuracy and stability of the numerical integration was assessed by means of representative numerical examples.

References Powered by Scopus

1393Citations
272Readers
Get full text

Co-simulation: A survey

299Citations
145Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rahikainen, J., González, F., Naya, M. Á., Sopanen, J., & Mikkola, A. (2020). On the cosimulation of multibody systems and hydraulic dynamics. Multibody System Dynamics, 50(2), 143–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-020-09727-z

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

45%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

36%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

9%

Researcher 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 10

83%

Physics and Astronomy 1

8%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0