Polarized classical non-associative lambek calculus and formal semantics

2Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

While initially motivated for studying natural language syntax, the intuitionistic bias underlying traditional Lambek calculi renders them particularly suitable to a Montagovian formal semantics through the Curry-Howard correspondence. Several recent proposals, however, have departed from the intuitionistic tradition, seeking instead to formulate 'classical' Lambek calculi. We show that this classical turn need not come at the cost of the tight connection with formal semantics, concentrating on De Groote and Lamarche's Classical Non-Associative Lambek calculus (CNL). Our work is founded in Girard's and Andreoli's research into polarities and focused proofs, suggesting the definition of polarized CNL, its connection to De Groote and Lamarche's original proposal explicated through the use of phase spaces. We conclude with a discussion of related literature, particularly Moortgat's Lambek-Grishin calculus. © 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bastenhof, A. (2011). Polarized classical non-associative lambek calculus and formal semantics. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6736 LNAI, pp. 33–48). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22221-4_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free