Retraction Note: Comparison of 0.05% cyclosporine and 3% diquafosol solution for dry eye patients: A randomized, blinded, multicenter clinical trial (BMC Ophthalmol (2019) 19: 131 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-019-1136-8)

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The editor has retracted this article [1]. In the accompanying trial registry [2] the authors stated that they conducted three separate arms of this clinical trial. The article only reports the results of two of the arms. The data and the results of this article are therefore unreliable. Additionally, there is considerable overlap with a previously published article by the same authors [3]. ∗∗All authors agree to this retraction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, C. H., Lee, H. K., Kim, M. K., Kim, E. C., Kim, J. Y., Kim, T. I., … Kim, H. S. (2020, June 23). Retraction Note: Comparison of 0.05% cyclosporine and 3% diquafosol solution for dry eye patients: A randomized, blinded, multicenter clinical trial (BMC Ophthalmol (2019) 19: 131 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-019-1136-8). BMC Ophthalmology. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01524-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free