Understanding the impact of surface roughness: changing from FTO to ITO to PEN/ITO for flexible perovskite solar cells

17Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

So far, single-junction flexible PSCs have been lacking in efficiency compared to rigid PSCs. Recently, > 23% have been reported. We therefore focus on understanding the differences between rigid and flexible substrates. One often neglected parameter is the different surface roughness which directly affects the perovskite film formation. Therefore, we adjust the layer thickness of SnO2 and the perovskite layers. Furthermore, we introduce a PMMA layer between the perovskite and the hole transporting material (HTM), spiro-MeOTAD, to mitigate shunting pathways. In addition, the multication perovskite Rb0.02Cs0.05FA0.77MA0.16Pb(I0.83Br0.17)3 is employed, resulting in stabilized performances of 16% for a flexible ITO substrate and 19% on a rigid ITO substrate.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Holzhey, P., Prettl, M., Collavini, S., Mortan, C., & Saliba, M. (2023). Understanding the impact of surface roughness: changing from FTO to ITO to PEN/ITO for flexible perovskite solar cells. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33147-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free