A Sociological Analysis of Structural Racism in “Student List” Lead Generation Products

7Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Colleges identify prospective students by purchasing “student lists.” Student list products are selection devices that use search filters to select students. Drawing from the sociology of race, we conceptualize some filters as “racialized inputs,” defined as inputs that are correlated with race because disadvantaged racial groups have historically been excluded from the input. Using a national sample of high school students, we explore the relationship between racialized search filters and the racial composition of included versus excluded students. Using data about actual lists purchased by public universities, we investigate how college administrators utilize racialized search filters. We discuss implications for federal and state policy. We motivate policy research about structural racism embedded in selection devices that allocate students to opportunities.

References Powered by Scopus

Whiteness as property

3569Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rethinking racism: Toward a structural interpretation

2131Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gender, race, and meritocracy in organizational careers

517Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Improving Researchers’ Capacity to Address Injustice: An Introduction to the Special Issue

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Vital Necessity of Critical Education Policy Research

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Critical Policy Analysis: Gains and Challenges

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jaquette, O., & Salazar, K. G. (2024). A Sociological Analysis of Structural Racism in “Student List” Lead Generation Products. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 46(2), 276–308. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737231210894

Readers over time

‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 2

40%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

40%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 2

40%

Computer Science 1

20%

Neuroscience 1

20%

Psychology 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0