Relative (Un)Importance of Introduced Animals as Pollinators and Dispersers of Native Plants

  • Kelly D
  • Robertson A
  • Ladley J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to examine the association between newscasters' facial expressions and the voting behavior of viewers. Study 1 examined the facial expressions exhibited by network news- casters while referring to the 1984 presidential candidates prior to the election. Results indicated that one of the three newscasters exhibited significantly more positive facial expressions when referring to Reagan than when referring to Mondale. Study 2 consisted of a telephone survey conducted to determine whether voting behavior was associated with the nightly news program watched. It was found that voters who regularly watched the newscaster who exhibited the biased facial expressions were significantly more likely to vote for the candidate that newscaster had smiled upon. Discussion considered possible explanations for, and implications of, this association between biases in news- casters' facial expressions and viewers' voting behavior.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kelly, D., Robertson, A. W., Ladley, J. J., Anderson, S. H., & McKenzie, R. J. (2006). Relative (Un)Importance of Introduced Animals as Pollinators and Dispersers of Native Plants. In Biological Invasions in New Zealand (pp. 227–245). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30023-6_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free