Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Is ventilation necessary?

233Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background. Prompt initiation of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves survival. Basic life support with mouth-to-mouth ventilation and chest compressions is intimidating, difficult to remember, and difficult to perform. Chest compressions alone can be easily taught, easily remembered, easily performed, adequately taught by dispatcher-delivered telephone instruction, and more readily accepted by the public. The principal objective of this study was to evaluate the need for ventilation during CPR in a clinically relevant swine model of prehospital witnessed cardiac arrest. Methods and Results. Thirty seconds after ventricular fibrillation, swine were randomly assigned to 12 minutes of chest compressions plus mechanical ventilation (group A), chest compressions only (group B), or no CPR (group C). Standard advanced cardiac life support was then provided. Animals successfully resuscitated were supported for 2 hours in an intensive care setting, and then observed for 24 hours. All 16 swine in groups A and B were successfully resuscitated and neurologically normal at 24 hours, whereas only 2 of 8 group C animals survived for 24 hours (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Berg, R. A., Kern, K. B., Sanders, A. B., Otto, C. W., Hilwig, R. W., & Ewy, G. A. (1993). Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Is ventilation necessary? Circulation, 88(4), 1907–1915. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.88.4.1907

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free