This presentation argues that we seldom speak of our findings in qualitative research as serendipitous, although we have splendid possibilities to make surprising findings. In order to enhance the chances and sharpen our analyses we have to read broadly but also pay attention to details in our data. We should avoid societal or scholarly conventionality, even be disobedient to recommendations, if this blinds us to new meanings of our findings. The value of serendipitous findings lies in the fact that they diverge from conventionally held knowledge. Thus, we have to retain our curiosity, with the "strange intoxication" or passion that Max Weber wrote about in Science as Vocation. © 2013 QSR.
CITATION STYLE
Åkerström, O. (2013). Curiosity and serendipity in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology Review, 9(2), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.09.2.02
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.