3D measurement - Comparison of CMM and 3D scanner

10Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Continuous improvement and optimization of products, which is the most often reflected in more complex geometrical and dimensional characteristics of products and increasing market demands for quality, lead to the development of new solutions in quality control. In industry today, the control of geometric characteristics is most often performed by the tactile method of probe stylus, i.e. using 3D coordinate measuring machines (CMM). Coordinate measuring machines have long been the only option in quality control of various products and have become generally accepted in industrial quality. In recent years, the development of digital technologies, i.e. the development of a new generation of hardware and software, has enabled the development of other methods of 3D measurement such as 3D scanner, which has proven to be a good alternative to CMM machines. The aim of this review is to provide insight into the areas of application of both devices as well as their advantages and disadvantages and possible future solutions and application of devices in this area.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stojkic, Z., Culjak, E., & Saravanja, L. (2020). 3D measurement - Comparison of CMM and 3D scanner. In Annals of DAAAM and Proceedings of the International DAAAM Symposium (Vol. 31, pp. 780–787). DAAAM International Vienna. https://doi.org/10.2507/31st.daaam.proceedings.108

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free