Gendered Pathways to Integration: Why Immigrants’ Naming Practices Differ by the Child’s Gender

4Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We analyze gender differences in immigrants’ ethnic boundary making using the example of name giving. We draw on the well-established finding that immigrants are more likely to choose a name that is common in the host country (strategy of boundary crossing) for female than for male descendants. We distinguish between two dimensions that help us to understand the gender gap in naming: the impact of origin-specific factors (institutionalization of gender equality in the country of origin and religious affiliation) and immigrants’ level of integration into the host country. Using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel Study on immigrants from 49 countries, we show that both sets of factors have a strong impact on immigrants’ boundary making in naming, as well as on the extent of the difference between daughters and sons: traditional gender role attitudes foster the gender gap in naming, whereas integration into the host country reduces it.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gerhards, J., & Tuppat, J. (2020). Gendered Pathways to Integration: Why Immigrants’ Naming Practices Differ by the Child’s Gender. Kolner Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 72(4), 597–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-020-00717-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free