Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase in patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke (AcT) Trial: Protocol for a Pragmatic Registry linked Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Sajobi T
  • Singh N
  • Almekhlafi M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background : Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase is widely used in acute ischemic stroke patients presenting early after symptom onset. Recent phase II trials have suggested that intravenous tenecteplase may be safer and associated with higher early reperfusion rates as compared to alteplase. This study investigates whether intravenous tenecteplase is non‐inferior to intravenous alteplase for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Methods : This is a pragmatic, registry‐linked, prospective, randomized (1:1) controlled, open‐label parallel group clinical trial with blinded endpoint assessment of 1600 patients to test if intravenous tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg body weight, max dose 25 mg) is non‐inferior to intravenous alteplase (0.9 mg/kg body weight, max dose 90 mg) in patients with acute ischemic stroke eligible for intravenous thrombolysis in clinical routine. Patients are recruited from comprehensive and primary stroke centers and enrolled using deferral of consent. The proposed sample has at least 90% power with a non‐inferiority margin of 5%, assuming incidence of 90‐day mRS 0–1 is 38% in the tenecteplase and 35% in the alteplase groups, and a loss to follow‐up rate < 5%. Results : The blinded primary endpoint is the proportion of subjects achieving a 90‐day mRS (modified Rankin scale) of 0–1. Key safety outcomes include 24‐hour symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and 90‐day all‐cause mortality. All serious adverse events within 24‐hour period will be reported and coded using MedDRA. Outcomes are collected either centrally (primary, key secondary and safety endpoints) or through ongoing Canadian stroke registries. The primary analysis is a simple unadjusted comparison of proportions. Conclusion : Results from the trial will provide real‐world evidence of the effectiveness of intravenous tenecteplase vs. alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting early after stroke onset. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03889249 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03889249 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sajobi, T., Singh, N., Almekhlafi, M. A., Buck, B., Ademola, A., Coutts, S. B., … Menon, B. K. (2022). Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase in patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke (AcT) Trial: Protocol for a Pragmatic Registry linked Randomized Clinical Trial. Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.121.000447

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free