Real Space

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Here we see the reason why the mature More could no longer explicate the nature of Hyle in spatial terms: because he now felt that space was much too real to fit the bill of an infinitely unreal first matter. I discuss More’s position in relation to that of other figures of his era, via a close analysis of his critique of Descartes’ theories of place and motion, and his apparent influence on figures like Newton and Locke.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reid, J. (2012). Real Space. In International Archives of the History of Ideas/Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idees (Vol. 207, pp. 103–139). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3988-8_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free