Perception of Students on Online Assessment: A Descriptive Study among Medical Undergraduates at Basic Sciences

0Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Assessment drives learning. Student assessment cannot be neglected in the long ongoing online learning during COVID-19 pandemic to motivate and assess students’ learning. Hence Patan Academy of Health Sciences (PAHS) conducted online assessment to medical undergraduates amidst limitations. Objective To measure the perception of online assessment of students which will provide applicable insights for the further improvement. Method This is a single center, cross-sectional and descriptive study. A Google form containing a semi-structured questionnaire was sent to MBBS students of Basic Science at PAHS who attended online classes and online examination. The responses from close ended questions expressed in percentage and Chi-square test was used to find the association. Open ended questions were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis. Result Of 118 students that responded, 75% passed the online examination. A majority of students (73%) stated that online exam motivated them in learning process and it could be a good alternative during pandemic time. However the most of students (56%) were unsatisfied with the modality of online assessment and reasons that they mentioned were technical problems (89%), inadequate online proctoring (77%), insufficient examination time (58%), lack of orientation to exam, lack of computer skills. Technical problem was worse in rural areas. Conclusion Even though online assessment motivated students’ learning during online classes, a large number of students were unsatisfied with assessment modality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maharjan, B. R., Devbhandari, R. P., Pradhan, P., Byanju, J., & Aryal, S. (2021). Perception of Students on Online Assessment: A Descriptive Study among Medical Undergraduates at Basic Sciences. Kathmandu University Medical Journal, 19(76), 451–459. https://doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v19i4.49760

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free