Phase 1 multicenter trial of brentuximab vedotin for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease

35Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Therapy for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD) remains suboptimal. Preclinical data demonstrate increased CD30 expression on activated CD8+ T cells during a GVHD. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting CD30. We conducted a multicenter phase 1 trial in 34 patients to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BV for SR-aGVHD treatment. A 3+3 cohort design was conducted initially with BV given weekly × 3 doses followed by maintenance dosing (initial dose 0.6 mg/kg IV weekly). Six patients were treated with the initial weekly dosing scheme; 2 of these patients died of neutropenic sepsis complications. The trial was subsequently revised to escalating cohorts of 5 patients treated every 2 weeks × 4 doses with a 4-week dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) period. Twenty-eight patients were treated with every-2-week dosing (n = 10 at 0.6 mg/kg; n = 18 at 0.8 mg/kg). MTD was defined at 0.8 mg/kg with 1 DLT observed (sepsis). At day 28, the overall response rate was 38.2% with 5 complete responses (CRs; 14.7%) and 8 very-good-partial responses (23.5%). An additional 7 patients achieved CR by day 56. With 12 months' follow-up on all patients, overall survival was 41% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25%-57%) at 6 months and 38% (95% CI, 22%-54%) at 12 months. CD30 expression on central memory CD8+, central memory CD4+, and regulatory T-lymphocyte subsets at enrollment was not associated with clinical response. BV is tolerable and has activity in SR-aGVHD and merits further investigation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, Y. B., Perales, M. A., Li, S., Kempner, M., Reynolds, C., Brown, J., … Cutler, C. (2017). Phase 1 multicenter trial of brentuximab vedotin for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease. Blood, 129(24), 3256–3261. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2017-03-772210

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free