Objectives: To determine whether the surface treatment of zirconia affects biofilm formation in an in vitro three-species biofilm model and in situ. Material and methods: Zirconia surfaces considered for the transmucosal portion of a zirconia implant were compared with polished pure titanium grade 4 (Tp). Disks 13 mm in diameter of either polished (Zp), polished and heat-treated (Zpt), machined (Zm), machined and heat-treated (Zmt) and sandblasted, etched and heat-treated (Z14) zirconia were fabricated. Surface roughness and wettability of specimens was measured. Biofilm formation was evaluated by safranin staining and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using a three-species model, and intraorally with 16 volunteers carrying oral splints in two independent experiments. Relative biofilm formation was compared with Kruskal–Wallis followed by Bonferroni post hoc test (α = 0.05). Results: In vitro biofilm formation with optical density values on Zp (0.14 ± 0.01), Zpt (0.14 ± 0.02), Zm (0.13 ± 0.01) and Zmt (0.13 ± 0.01) was significantly lower than on Tp (0.21 ± 0.05) and Z14 (0.20 ± 0.04) (p
CITATION STYLE
Jaeggi, M., Gyr, S., Astasov-Frauenhoffer, M., Zitzmann, N. U., Fischer, J., & Rohr, N. (2022). Influence of different zirconia surface treatments on biofilm formation in vitro and in situ. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 33(4), 424–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13902
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.