Small-dose selective spinal anaesthesia for short-duration outpatient gynaecological laparoscopy: Recovery characteristics compared with propofol anaesthesia

29Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A randomized controlled trial compared recovery characteristics after selective spinal anaesthesia (SSA) or propofol general anaesthesia (GA) for short-duration outpatient laparoscopic surgery. Forty women were randomized to receive either SSA (1% lidocaine 10 mg, sufentanil 10 μg and sterile water 1.8 ml) or GA (propofol and nitrous oxide 50% in oxygen). Compared with the GA group, times to leaving the operating room, performing a straight leg raise, performing deep knee-bends and achieving an Aldrete score >9 and the time in Phase II recovery were significantly shorter (P<0.05) in the SSA group.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stewart, A. V. G., Vaghadia, H., Collins, L., & Mitchell, G. W. E. (2001). Small-dose selective spinal anaesthesia for short-duration outpatient gynaecological laparoscopy: Recovery characteristics compared with propofol anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 86(4), 570–572. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/86.4.570

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free