Neural Network Acceptability Judgments

712Citations
Citations of this article
323Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper investigates the ability of artificial neural networks to judge the grammatical acceptability of a sentence, with the goal of testing their linguistic competence. We introduce the Corpus of Linguistic Acceptability (CoLA), a set of 10,657 English sentences labeled as grammatical or ungrammatical from published linguistics literature. As baselines, we train several recurrent neural network models on acceptability classification, and find that our models outperform unsupervised models by Lau et al. (2016) on CoLA. Error-analysis on specific grammatical phenomena reveals that both Lau et al.’s models and ours learn systematic generalizations like subject-verbobject order. However, all models we test perform far below human level on a wide range of grammatical constructions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Warstadt, A., Singh, A., & Bowman, S. R. (2019). Neural Network Acceptability Judgments. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 7, 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00290

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free