Vegetative growth of three southern highbush blueberry cultivars obtained from micropropagation and softwood cuttings in two florida locations

17Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Field performance of southern highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L. interspecific hybrids) cultivars Emerald, Jewel, and Primadonna derived from softwood cuttings (SW) and tissue culture (TC) was evaluated in Citra and Haines City, FL, in 2010-12. Both fields were planted in Apr. 2010 on sandy soil amended with pine bark. Plant height and width were recorded at both locations, from which plant canopy volume was calculated. Additionally, whole plants were harvested at planting and after the first growing season, after the first fruit harvest, and after the second growing season. Average plant height and width, number of major canes, and total shoot number were determined at each sampling date. Dry weights for roots, crowns, canes, shoots, and leaves were obtained. Although propagation method affected plant canopy volume during the first season, no effects were observed by the end of the second growing season. At planting and after the first and second growing seasons, TC plants of the three cultivars had more major canes. Total shoot number per plant was greater for TC 'Jewel' at all dates but 'Emerald' TC plants had more shoots only at planting and after the first growing and harvest seasons. Tissue culture resulted in increased plant dry weights of 'Jewel' and 'Emerald' after the first and second growing seasons. There were no significant differences in total number of shoots or plant dry weight between TC and SW-derived 'Primadonna' plants at any point during the study.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marino, S. R., Williamson, J. G., Olmstead, J. W., & Harmon, P. F. (2014). Vegetative growth of three southern highbush blueberry cultivars obtained from micropropagation and softwood cuttings in two florida locations. HortScience, 49(5), 556–561. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.49.5.556

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free