Clinical outcomes of proton beam therapy for choroidal melanoma at a single institute in Korea

12Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose This study retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes and complications of proton beam therapy (PBT) in a single institution in Korea and quantitatively analyzed the change in tumor volume after PBT using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods Twenty-four treatment-naïve patients who underwent PBT for choroidal melanoma between 2009 and 2015 were reviewed. Dose fractionation was 60-70 cobalt gray equivalents over 5 fractions. Orbital MRIs were taken at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after PBT and annually thereafter. The tumor volume was reconstructed and evaluated by stacking the tumor boundary in each thin-sliced axial T1-weighted image using MIM software. Results The median follow-up duration was 36.5 months (range, 9 to 82 months). One patient had suspicious local progression and two patients had distant metastasis. The 3-year local progression- free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival rates were 95.8%, 95.8%, and 100%, respectively. Five Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event ver. 4.03 grade 3-4 toxicities were observed in four patients (16.7%), including one with neovascular glaucoma. The mean tumor volume at the baseline MRI was 0.565±0.084 mL (range, 0.074 to 1.610 mL), and the ratios of the mean volume at 3, 6, and 12 months to that at baseline were 81.8%, 67.3%, and 60.4%, respectively. Conclusion The local control rate and complication profile after PBT in patients with choroidal melanoma in Korea were comparable with those reported in a previous PBT series. The change in tumor volume after PBT exhibited a gradual regression pattern on MRI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, T. W., Choi, E., Park, J., Shin, D. ho, Jung, S. K., Seok, S., … Moon, S. H. (2018). Clinical outcomes of proton beam therapy for choroidal melanoma at a single institute in Korea. Cancer Research and Treatment, 50(2), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.070

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free