Bridging language-based and process calculi security

26Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Language-based and process calculi-based information security are well developed fields of computer security. Although these fields have much in common, it is somewhat surprising that the literature lacks a comprehensive account of a formal link between the two disciplines. This paper develops such a link between a language-based specification of security and a process-algebraic framework for security properties. Encoding imperative programs into a CCS-like process calculus, we show that timing-sensitive security for these programs exactly corresponds to the well understood process-algebraic security property of persistent bisimulation-based nondeducibility on compositions (P_BNDC). This rigorous connection opens up possibilities for cross-fertilization, leading to both flexible policies when specifying the security of heterogeneous systems and to a synergy of techniques for enforcing security specifications. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.

References Powered by Scopus

Language-based information-flow security

1481Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Note on the Confinement Problem

1037Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Certification of Programs for Secure Information Flow

775Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Declassification: Dimensions and principles

163Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Information-flow security for interactive programs

72Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Flexible scheduler-independent security

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Focardi, R., Rossi, S., & Sabelfeld, A. (2005). Bridging language-based and process calculi security. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 3441, pp. 299–315). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31982-5_19

Readers over time

‘09‘11‘12‘13‘16‘17‘18‘20‘21‘2202468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

93%

Researcher 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 14

93%

Social Sciences 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0