Construct Refinement in Tests of Academic Literacy

8Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

For several reasons, the construct underlying post-entry tests of academic literacy in South Africa such as the Test of Academic Literacy Levels (TALL) and its postgraduate counterpart, the Test of Academic Literacy for Postgraduate Students (TALPS), deserves further scrutiny. First, the construct has not been further investigated in close to a decade of use. Second, acknowledging the typicality of academic discourse as a starting point for critically engaging with constructs of academic literacy may suggest design changes for such tests. This contribution surveys and critiques various attempts at identifying the typical features of academic discourse and concludes that the uniqueness of academic discourse lies in the primacy of the logical or analytical mode that guides it. Using this characteristic feature as a criterion is potentially productive in suggesting ways to add components to the current test construct of academic literacy tests that are widely used in South Africa, such as TALL, TAG (the Afrikaans counterpart of TALL), and TALPS, as well as a new test of academic literacy for Sesotho. Third, a recent analysis of the diagnostic information that can be gleaned from TALPS (Pot 2013) may inform strategies of utilising post-entry tests of language ability (PELAs) more efficiently. This contribution includes suggestions for modifications and additions to the design of current task types in tests of academic literacy. These tentative suggestions allow theoretically defensible modifications to the design of the tests, and will be useful to those responsible for developing further versions of these tests of academic literacy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weideman, A., Patterson, R., & Pot, A. (2016). Construct Refinement in Tests of Academic Literacy. In English Language Education (Vol. 6, pp. 179–196). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39192-2_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free