Evaluating translational research: A process marker model

135Citations
Citations of this article
229Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: We examine the concept of translational research from the perspective of evaluators charged with assessing translational efforts. One of the major tasks for evaluators involved in translational research is to help assess efforts that aim to reduce the time it takes to move research to practice and health impacts. Another is to assess efforts that are intended to increase the rate and volume of translation. Methods: We offer an alternative to the dominant contemporary tendency to define translational research in terms of a series of discrete "phases."Results: We contend that this phased approach has been confusing and that it is insufficient as a basis for evaluation. Instead, we argue for the identification of key operational and measurable markers along a generalized process pathway from research to practice. Conclusions: This model provides a foundation for the evaluation of interventions designed to improve translational research and the integration of these findings into a field of translational studies. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc..

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trochim, W., Kane, C., Graham, M. J., & Pincus, H. A. (2011, June). Evaluating translational research: A process marker model. Clinical and Translational Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00291.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free