Drought inhibits photosynthetic capacity more in females than in males of Populus cathayana

115Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We investigated sex-related photosynthetic responses to drought in the dioecious species, Populus cathayana Rehd. Plants were subjected to two watering regimes (100% and 30% of field capacity) in a semi-controlled environment. Drought significantly decreased leaf area (LA), total number of leaves (TNL), specific leaf area (SLA), relative water content, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration (E), stomatal conductance (gs), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), light saturation point (LSP), apparent quantum yield (Φ), carboxylation efficiency (CE), light-saturated photosynthetic rate (Pmax), maximum efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) and maximum effective quantum yield of PSII (Yield), and increased the total chlorophyll concentration (TC), CO 2 compensation point (Γ), non-photochemical quenching coefficient, peroxidase (POD) activity and carbon isotope composition (δ13C). Moreover, differences between males and females were detected in many of these responses. In the drought treatment, males exhibited significantly higher LA, TNL, TC, concentration of carotenoids (Caro), P n, E, gs, Ci, LSP, Φ, CE, P max, Fv/Fm, photochemical quenching coefficient, POD activity and δ13C, but a lower SLA, chlorophyll a/b ratio, carotenoids/total chlorophyll ratio and Γ than females. However, Caro, LSP, Γ, Φ, CE and POD activity were apparently associated with sex-related resource demands, because significant differences in these traits were detected between the sexes under well-watered conditions. Our results indicate that drought stress limits photosynthetic capacity more in females than in males. © 2008 Heron Publishing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xu, X., Peng, G., Wu, C., Korpelainen, H., & Li, C. (2008). Drought inhibits photosynthetic capacity more in females than in males of Populus cathayana. Tree Physiology, 28(11), 1751–1759. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/28.11.1751

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free