Predictive factors of diagnostic and therapeutic divergence in a nationwide cohort of patients seeking second medical opinion

2Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the profile of patients who sought a second medical opinion (SMO) on their therapeutic or diagnostic strategy using nationwide data from a French physician network dedicated to SMOs. Methods: An observational cohort study was conducted and the study population consisted of patients residing in France or in the French overseas territories who submitted a request for an SMO through a dedicated platform between January 2016 and October 2020. Patient characteristics were compared between convergent and divergent SMOs. The divergent rate for all patients excluding those with mental diseases were described. Logistic regression was used to estimate the probability of a divergent SMO according to patient characteristics. Results and discussion: In total, 1,552 adult patients over several French regions were included. The divergence rate was 32.3 % (n = 502 patients). Gynecological [Odds Ratio (OR) and 95 % CI: 5.176 (3.154 to 8.494)], urological [OR 4.246 (2.053 to 8.782)] and respiratory diseases [OR 3.639 (1.357 to 9.758)] had the highest probability of a divergent SMO. Complex cases were also associated with a significantly higher risk of a divergent opinion [OR 2.78 (2.16 to 3.59)]. Age, sex, region and profession were not found to be predictive of a divergent second opinion. Conclusions: Policymakers should encourage new research on patient outcomes such as mortality and hospitalization rates after a SMO. When proven effective, SMO networks will have the potential to benefit from specific public funding or even play a key role in national healthcare quality improvement programs.

References Powered by Scopus

Mandatory second opinion to reduce rates of unnecessary caesarean sections in Latin America: A cluster randomised controlled trial

151Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Patient-driven second opinions in oncology: A systematic review

96Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Consensus conference on second opinions in diagnostic anatomic pathology: Who, what, and when

83Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Predicting counseling behavioral propensity based on temporal return visits patterns and current perceived intensity with chronic conditions management

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Spine surgeons facing second opinions: a qualitative study

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sanchez, S., Adamowicz, I., Chrusciel, J., Denormandie, P., Denys, P., & Degos, L. (2021). Predictive factors of diagnostic and therapeutic divergence in a nationwide cohort of patients seeking second medical opinion. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06936-w

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

89%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 6

67%

Physics and Astronomy 1

11%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

11%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free