Integrity and Agency: Being True to the Self

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Beginning with the case of Alan Greenspan and related credit crisis issues, this chapter first sets out the first mode of responsibility: attributability. Attributability focuses on causation, expressed in effective decision-making and the practice of critical agency and self-governance. Agency is analysed in holistic terms of critical relationship to ideas (cognitive); values, especially ethical values (affective); practice (based in time and space); worth, not simply self-esteem but a sense of worth, focused in purpose, and worldview; and the social and physical environment (interactive and interconnected). From responsibility for reflection on the whole person or organization the chapter then looks at views of the self in relation to plurality, based on development, narrative and dialogue. Built on a social constructionist view of identity, personal and organizational, this suggests a view of integrity as dynamic and continuously developing re-presentation of the plural self.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Robinson, S. (2016). Integrity and Agency: Being True to the Self. In Palgrave Studies in Governance, Leadership and Responsibility (Vol. Part F1749, pp. 31–61). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51553-7_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free