The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0

1.6kCitations
Citations of this article
551Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The Chicago Classification (CC) of esophageal motility disorders, utilizing an algorithmic scheme to analyze clinical high-resolution manometry (HRM) studies, has gained acceptance worldwide. Methods: This 2014 update, CC v3.0, developed by the International HRM Working Group, incorporated the extensive clinical experience and interval publications since the prior (2011) version. Key Results: Chicago Classification v3.0 utilizes a hierarchical approach, sequentially prioritizing: (i) disorders of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow (achalasia subtypes I-III and EGJ outflow obstruction), (ii) major disorders of peristalsis (absent contractility, distal esophageal spasm, hypercontractile esophagus), and (iii) minor disorders of peristalsis characterized by impaired bolus transit. EGJ morphology, characterized by the degree of overlap between the lower esophageal sphincter and the crural diaphragm and baseline EGJ contractility are also part of CC v3.0. Compared to the previous CC version, the key metrics of interpretation, the integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), the distal contractile integral (DCI), and the distal latency (DL) remain unchanged, albeit with much more emphasis on DCI for defining both hypo- and hypercontractility. New in CC v3.0 are: (i) the evaluation of the EGJ at rest defined in terms of morphology and contractility, (ii) 'fragmented' contractions (large breaks in the 20-mmHg isobaric contour), (iii) ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), and (iv) several minor adjustments in nomenclature and defining criteria. Absent in CC v3.0 are contractile front velocity and small breaks in the 20-mmHg isobaric contour as defining characteristics. Conclusions & Inferences: Chicago Classification v3.0 is an updated analysis scheme for clinical esophageal HRM recordings developed by the International HRM Working Group. View the podcast on this paper at the following sites: Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHFT4mj-Yw4&feature=youtu.be iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/neurogastroenterology-motility/id955822234 The Chicago Classification (CC) of esophageal motility disorders, utilizing an algorithmic scheme to analyze clinical high-resolution manometry (HRM) studies, has gained acceptance worldwide. This 2014 update, CC v3.0, developed by the International HRM Working Group, incorporated the extensive clinical experience and interval publications since the prior (2011) version.

References Powered by Scopus

Achalasia: A New Clinically Relevant Classification by High-Resolution Manometry

708Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography

698Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

High-resolution manometry in clinical practice: Utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities

294Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Modern diagnosis of GERD: The Lyon Consensus

1056Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0<sup>©</sup>

702Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Esophageal disorders

446Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kahrilas, P. J., Bredenoord, A. J., Fox, M., Gyawali, C. P., Roman, S., Smout, A. J. P. M., … Zerbib, F. (2015). The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterology and Motility, 27(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12477

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2503570105140

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 203

67%

Researcher 61

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 31

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 8

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 325

92%

Nursing and Health Professions 10

3%

Engineering 9

3%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 195

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0