Identifying how metacognitive judgments influence student performance during learning with MetaTutorIVH

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Students need to accurately monitor and judge the difficulty of learning materials to effectively self-regulate their learning with advanced learning technologies such as intelligent tutoring systems (ITSs), including MetaTutorIVH. However, there is a paucity of research examining how metacognitive monitoring processes such as ease of learning (EOLs) judgments can be used to provide adaptive scaffolding and predict student performance during learning ITSs. In this paper, we report on a study investigating how students’ EOL judgments can influence their performance and significantly predict their learning outcomes during learning with MetaTutorIVH, an ITS for human physiology. The results have important design implications for incorporating different types of metacognitive judgements in student models to support metacognition and foster learning of complex ITSs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mudrick, N. V., Sawyer, R., Price, M. J., Lester, J., Roberts, C., & Azevedo, R. (2018). Identifying how metacognitive judgments influence student performance during learning with MetaTutorIVH. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10858 LNCS, pp. 140–149). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91464-0_14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free