Feeling Nature, Reconsidered: Ecocriticism, Affect, and the Case of H Is for Hawk

2Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This essay considers how affect theory might inform ecocriticism. While ecocriticism has historically rejected anthropocentrism, recent nature writing such as Helen Macdonald’s bestselling H Is for Hawk embraces human experience, including the subtleties of human emotion. Drawing on work by William Reddy and other theorists of affect, Ottum argues that affect is not only anthropocentric: in H Is for Hawk affect amplifies the text’s “ecocentric” elements. By describing her own process of feeling, reflecting, and learning to describe her emotions, Macdonald models for readers how to “do something” with the affective intensities provoked by nonhuman nature. Specifically, the text demonstrates how affect can be channeled toward a stance of humility and respect for nature’s agency.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ottum, L. (2019). Feeling Nature, Reconsidered: Ecocriticism, Affect, and the Case of H Is for Hawk. In Palgrave Studies in Affect Theory and Literary Criticism (pp. 235–249). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97268-8_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free