Climbing Route Difficulty Grade Prediction and Explanation

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article focuses on sport climbing and on the design of innovative tools for supporting climbers to browse and search routes to climb. The difficulty of a route, its grade, is normally assessed by expert climbers, named route setters. A regular climber, after trying a route, may perceive it more or less difficult than the route setter. It is important to estimate this climber's perceived difficulty of the routes in order to suggest the routes that have a target perceived difficulty as expected by the climber. We develop a knowledge-based approach that uses domain-specific features to train a predictive model. Additionally, the problem is modeled as a rating prediction task in a recommender system, using a matrix factorization approach with a custom normalization solution. The knowledge-based approach enables us to develop a grade prediction explanation functionality. In off-line experiments, we demonstrate improvements over a baseline. Moreover, we show how the proposed techniques can be exploited in an app developed by a major company offering information services to the sport climbing market.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Map and Content-Based Climbing Recommender System

5Citations
14Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Andric, M., Ivanova, I., & Ricci, F. (2021). Climbing Route Difficulty Grade Prediction and Explanation. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (pp. 285–292). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3486622.3493932

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2501234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

40%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

Researcher 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 3

60%

Sports and Recreations 1

20%

Neuroscience 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0