Humanistic and economic burden of nausea and vomiting among migraine sufferers

23Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: While studies have demonstrated the economic burden of migraines in terms of quality of life, health care resource use (HRU), and costs, there exists a notable paucity of data comparing such outcomes among migraineurs with nausea and vomiting (N/V) and those without. The current study aimed to address this gap. Methods: This was a retrospective study using data from the 2013 US National Health and Wellness Survey, a cross-sectional, internet-based survey. Respondents self-reported their migraine with or without N/V along with demographics and outcomes including depression (Patient Health Questionnaire total score; PHQ-9), sleep problems (11-item total score of sleep problems), HRU (number of physician visits, emergency room [ER] visits, and hospitalizations) and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-General Health Scale (WPAI-GH), and associated mean annual costs. Generalized linear models, adjusting for covariates, assessed the burden of N/V on all outcomes. Results: Among all migraineurs (N=7,855), 73.4% were female, mean age was 41.82 years old, and 57.6% reported experiencing N/V. Adjusting for covariates, migraineurs with N/V vs without N/V had higher mean PHQ-9 scores (7.91 vs 7.02, p<0.001) and mean sleep problems (3.29 vs 2.64, p<0.001). Mean ER visits were more frequent among migraineurs with N/V than those without N/V (0.48 vs 0.38, p=0.001). This difference translated into a 26.3% increase in estimated mean ER costs (N/V=US$1,499 vs without N/V=US$1,187, p=0.002). Mean percentage activity impairment was higher in migraineurs with N/V than in those without N/V (37.73% vs 35.12%, p=0.002) and migraineurs with N/V had higher work productivity loss costs (N/ V=US$10,344 vs without N/V=US$9,218, p=0.016). Conclusion: Migraine patients with N/V reported worse depression, sleep problems, and activity impairment, and higher ER visits than those without N/V. Migraine with N/V was also associated with an increase in mean annual ER visit costs and work productivity loss costs. Study findings suggest unmet needs with current treatment options for migraine patients with N/V.

References Powered by Scopus

A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation

42853Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure

35421Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The PHQ-9: A new depression diagnostic and severity measure

4905Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Comorbidities of primary headache disorders: a literature review with meta-analysis

140Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Health care Resource Utilization and Migraine Disability Along the Migraine Continuum Among Patients Treated for Migraine

68Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pathophysiology and Therapy of Associated Features of Migraine

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gajria, K., Lee, L. K., Flores, N. M., Aycardi, E., & Gandhi, S. K. (2017). Humanistic and economic burden of nausea and vomiting among migraine sufferers. Journal of Pain Research, 10, 689–698. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S124683

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 8

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

44%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 8

53%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 3

20%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

13%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 10

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free