Risk Assessment for Newly Diagnosed Fit Young Patients with Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Treatment Modalities: Should There Be Additional Factors Taken into Consideration??

1Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: The optimal treatment for young patients with high-risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) remains a challenge. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 58 NDMM patients younger than 55 years treated in our center from 2010 to 2021 with the current recommended protocols. Results: After a median follow-up of 48 months, median overall survival (OS) was not reached; however, approximately 25% of them died within 4 years after diagnosis. Advanced disease stage, presence of extramedullary disease, elevated LDH, and less than very good remission before autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation adversely affected patient survival. Based on these factors, we created a risk-assessment scoring system that sufficiently discriminated young NDMM patients at risk of poor outcome. The 4-year OS was superior for patients with zero to two factors to those with three to five factors (86% vs 44%, p<0.001). Conclusion: The proposed scoring system could be reliably used at diagnosis and at interim disease evaluation in aiming for personalized treatment for young NDMM patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kaloyannidis, P., Abdulla, F., Mutahar, E., Al Hashim, H., Al Harbi, S., Estanislao, A., & Al Hashmi, H. (2022). Risk Assessment for Newly Diagnosed Fit Young Patients with Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Treatment Modalities: Should There Be Additional Factors Taken into Consideration?? Journal of Blood Medicine, 13, 619–630. https://doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S380133

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free