How to derive priorities in AHP: A comparative study

150Citations
Citations of this article
139Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A heated discussion has arisen over the "best" priorities derivation method. Using a Monte Carlo simulation this article compares and evaluates the solutions of four AHP ratio scaling methods: the right eigenvalue method, the left eigenvalue method, the geometric mean and the mean of normalized values. Matrices with different dimensions and degree of impurities are randomly constructed. We observe a high level of agreement between the different scaling techniques. The number of ranking contradictions increases with the dimension of the matrix and the inconsistencies. However, these contradictions affect only close priorities. © 2006 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ishizaka, A., & Lusti, M. (2006). How to derive priorities in AHP: A comparative study. In Central European Journal of Operations Research (Vol. 14, pp. 387–400). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-006-0012-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free