It is argued that justice in some cases provides a pro tanto reason genetically to enhance victims of the genetic lottery. Various arguments - both to the effect that justice provides no such reason and to the effect that while there may be such reasons, they are overridden by certain moral constraints - are considered and rejected. Finally, it is argued that justice provides stronger reasons to perform more traditional medical tasks (treatments), and that therefore genetic enhancements should not play an important role in a public health care system.
CITATION STYLE
Holtug, N. (1999). Does justice require genetic enhancements? Journal of Medical Ethics, 25(2), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.25.2.137
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.