Ghost-Fishing Gear: Have Fishing Practices During the Past Few Years Reduced the Impact?

  • Carr H
  • Harris J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Fish stocks are depressed worldwide. The resultant economic hardships on many fish- ermen have forced changes in fishing opera- tions and effort. In general, ,;ear use and losses in trap or pot fisheries appear to be increasing concurrent with a shift to more durable gear and designs. Modifications in trawl construction and operations have re- sulted in increased net damage and loss. Evi- dence from a number of locafions around the world indicates that recent demersal gillnet- ting practices are leaving more gear per fishing unit in the oceans; in some cases this lost gear is heavily concentrated' on produc- tive fishing grounds. These changes in tradi- tional gear types and fishing methods are Certainly increasing the potential for loss of Commercial and noncommercial species be- cause of ghost-fishing. With emphasis on New England area fish- eties, this paper reviews fishing operations and gear construction for trap (or pot), mo- bUe trawl, demersal gillnet, longline, jigging, weir, and pound net fisheries with regard to the ghost-fishing impact on marine fish, the benthos, and other maritime activities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carr, H. A., & Harris, J. (1997). Ghost-Fishing Gear: Have Fishing Practices During the Past Few Years Reduced the Impact? (pp. 141–151). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8486-1_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free