Pancreatic phospholipase A2 contributes to lung injury in experimental meconium aspiration

16Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To investigate the role of pancreatic (group I) secretory PLA2 (sPLA2-I) in the pathogenesis of meconium aspiration syndrome, human particulate meconium or its supernatant either before or after extraction of PLA2-I was insufflated into rat lungs. In addition, the pulmonary effects of intra-tracheal human and bovine PLA2-I were studied. Lungs with saline instillation served as controls. Intrapulmonary particulate meconium (both before and after PLA2-I extraction), unlike meconium supernatant, resulted in markedly elevated lung tissue PLA2 catalytic activity and human PLA2-I concentrations when compared with controls. On the other hand, tissue concentrations of the group II PLA 2 remained unchanged in all meconium lungs. Pulmonary PLA 2-I concentrations further correlated positively with lung injury scores. Instillation of meconium-derived human PLA2-I, at a concentration of one-third of that in particulate meconium, did not raise PLA2 activity or concentrations of PLA2-I or PLA 2-II in the lung tissue from the control level, but still resulted in significantly elevated lung wet/diy ratio and injury score. In contrast, insufflation of bovine pancreatic PLA2 increased the lung tissue enzyme activity and wet/dry ratio from the control level, but had no effect on the type II PLA2 concentration or lung injury score. Our data thus indicate that human pancreatic PLA2, introduced in high amounts within aspirated meconium especially in particulate form, is a potent inducer of lung tissue inflammatory injury. Copyright © 2006 International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sippola, T., Aho, H., Peuravuori, H., Lukkarinen, H., Gunn, J., & Kääpä, P. (2006). Pancreatic phospholipase A2 contributes to lung injury in experimental meconium aspiration. Pediatric Research, 59(5), 641–645. https://doi.org/10.1203/01.pdr.0000214685.31232.6a

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free