An Out-of-Sample Evaluation of Dynamic Portfolio Strategies

16Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article evaluates out-of-sample portfolio performance for a real-time investor who can exploit time variation in the conditional mean and volatility of stock returns in optimizing a multiperiod portfolio choice problem. With the presence of parameter uncertainty, our out-of-sample analysis shows that ignoring time variation in the first two return moments leads to significant utility costs of at least 1.97% of annualized certainty equivalent return. Accounting for the time-varying risk premium plays a more important role than considering time-varying volatility in improving portfolio performance. Interestingly, behaving myopically or ignoring the hedge against changes in future investment opportunities can lead to small out-of-sample utility losses or even utility gains.

References Powered by Scopus

Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model

3128Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The equity premium: A puzzle

2681Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Expected stock returns and volatility

2242Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

DEA frontier improvement and portfolio rebalancing: An application of China mutual funds on considering sustainability information disclosure

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stock Market Mean Reversion and Portfolio Choice over the Life Cycle

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Heuristic portfolio trading rules with capital gain taxes

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lan, C. (2015). An Out-of-Sample Evaluation of Dynamic Portfolio Strategies. Review of Finance, 19(6), 2359–2399. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfu052

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

45%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

27%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

14%

Researcher 3

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12

55%

Business, Management and Accounting 6

27%

Mathematics 3

14%

Arts and Humanities 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0