Centre-Province Relations in Personalist Autocracies: Explaining the Emergence and Survival of Powerful Provincial Leaders

5Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We have limited knowledge of how the insecure environment characteristic of personalist dictatorships affects the behaviour of provincial leaders. In this article, we argue that such provincial leaders face a trade-off: either they can keep a low profile but remain vulnerable to the capriciousness of the ruler (the acquiescent strategy), or they can gamble and try to build a power base of their own as a defence against the whims of the dictator (the power-accruing strategy). Next, we specify three contextual conditions, each of which makes provincial leaders more likely to choose and succeed with a power-accruing strategy, which in turn allows them to rule their province with an iron fist. Finally, empirically, we illustrate our arguments through a number of example cases and an in-depth study of a contemporary, very powerful provincial leader in a personalist authoritarian regime: Ramzan Kadyrov, leader of the Chechen Republic within Vladimir Putin's Russia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tolstrup, J., & Souleimanov, E. (2022). Centre-Province Relations in Personalist Autocracies: Explaining the Emergence and Survival of Powerful Provincial Leaders. Government and Opposition, 57(3), 446–466. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free