Indications for penetrating keratoplasty and anterior lamellar keratoplasty during 2010-2017

11Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

• AIM: To review the indications of penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALK) at Qingdao Eye Hospital, Shandong Eye Institute, Qingdao, China, from 2010 to 2017. • METHODS: The data of all patients undergoing PK or ALK from January 2010 to December 2017 was retrospectively reviewed, with the indications during 2010-2013 and 2014-2017 compared. • RESULTS: A total of 1869 eyes were included, among which 1405 eyes (75.2%) had PK and 464 eyes (24.8%) had ALK. The leading indications were suppurative keratitis (36.8%), keratoconus (15.5%), herpes keratitis (13.1%), and regraft (10.5%). In eyes undergoing PK, the top four indications were suppurative keratitis (38.7%), herpes keratitis (15.3%), keratoconus (12.6%), and regraft (12.5%) during 2014-2017, with the proportion of suppurative keratitis and herpes keratitis decreased while regraft and keratoconus increased compared with 2010-2013. In eyes with ALK, suppurative keratitis (30.8%), keratoconus (24.1%), corneal dystrophies and degenerations (10.6%), and corneal dermoid tumor (9.7%) were the top four indications, and there was no significant difference for the proportion of each indication between 2010-2013 and 2014-2017. • CONCLUSION: Suppurative keratitis is the most common indication for PK and ALK at Qingdao Eye Hospital during 2010-2017, followed by keratoconus, herpes keratitis, and regraft. In eyes treated with PK, the proportion of suppurative keratitis and herpes keratitis decrease while regraft and keratoconus increase during 2014-2017 compared with 2010-2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sun, X. T., Zhai, H. L., Cheng, J., Kong, Q. Q., Cong, L., Li, L., & Hao, W. P. (2019). Indications for penetrating keratoplasty and anterior lamellar keratoplasty during 2010-2017. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 12(12), 1878–1884. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2019.12.10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free