Indirect calorimetry: should it be part of routine care or only used in specific situations?

7Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose of reviewIndirect calorimetry (IC) is increasingly recommended to guide energy delivery in the ICU. This review aims to provide a critical overview of current literature in support of these recommendations.Recent findingsThere is insufficient evidence to ascertain a mortality benefit from IC-guided energy delivery. However, large variations in energy expenditure during critical illness pose a risk for significant under- and overfeeding if IC is not routinely used.SummaryEven in the absence of demonstrable clinical benefits, there is a strong physiological rationale in favor of performing IC. Measurements can be prioritized in complex patients and should be repeated during prolonged ICU stay.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sundström Rehal, M., Tatucu-Babet, O. A., & Oosterveld, T. (2023, March 1). Indirect calorimetry: should it be part of routine care or only used in specific situations? Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000000895

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free