Purpose of reviewIndirect calorimetry (IC) is increasingly recommended to guide energy delivery in the ICU. This review aims to provide a critical overview of current literature in support of these recommendations.Recent findingsThere is insufficient evidence to ascertain a mortality benefit from IC-guided energy delivery. However, large variations in energy expenditure during critical illness pose a risk for significant under- and overfeeding if IC is not routinely used.SummaryEven in the absence of demonstrable clinical benefits, there is a strong physiological rationale in favor of performing IC. Measurements can be prioritized in complex patients and should be repeated during prolonged ICU stay.
CITATION STYLE
Sundström Rehal, M., Tatucu-Babet, O. A., & Oosterveld, T. (2023, March 1). Indirect calorimetry: should it be part of routine care or only used in specific situations? Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000000895
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.